Friday, April 12, 2013

Normandy Part 2: A Combat Rigger’s Mission

The question of whether Bill was in Normandy has already been answered conclusively by the previous post concerning Part 1 of this series on Normandy. Let’s turn our attention now to the mystery surrounding his participation in that historic campaign by shedding some light on the questions asked at the beginning of that post:

  1. Was Bill selected to jump as a 505 PIR combat rigger?
  2. Which unit was he assigned to for the Normandy invasion?
  3. What was his mission in Normandy?
  4. Did he arrive in Normandy via parachute or glider and on what date?

In the process we’ll learn a lot about the history of the 82nd Airborne Division combat parachute riggers in WWII. Their story is part of the Division’s heritage and it’s one that’s all but lost. Outside of a few dusty manuscripts and reports housed in the nearly inaccessible vaults of museum archives, the story of these paratroopers remains largely unknown to interested parties. Hopefully, this blog entry and the next will do the topic some justice by documenting the structure and function of 82nd Airborne combat rigger units and the onerous yet vital tasks the paratroopers assigned to them had to perform.

Question 1: Was Bill selected to jump as a 505 PIR combat rigger?

Mission, Organization, and Tasks of the Combat Riggers in the 82nd Airborne Parachute Maintenance Company in WWII

Ever since the unit’s formation in 1942 and until March 1, 1945, the company’s designation was the 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company (PMC) (Provisional). In a technical sense, the men working in this unit remained assigned to their respective parent companies or battalions. In particular, the  riggers of Service Company 505 PIR and 504 PIR; the riggers of the 456 and 376 Parachute Field Artillery Battalions; and those of the 307 Parachute Engineers Battalion were technically assigned to their parent units the 82nd Airborne Division. For the Normandy Campaign the riggers of Service Company 507 PIR and 508 PIR also remained technically assigned to their respective regiments. In all cases these men were assigned to Special Duty with the 82nd PMC (Provisional) until relieved to be reassigned to their parent companies or other units as the need arose. Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 9. Date unknown.

Being technically assigned to their parent units, carried practical implications for the riggers. For the purposes of payroll, Bill and the other 505 riggers are listed as being assigned to Service Company 505th PIR for the period June, July, August and September, 1943, despite the fact that various times during this period, these men were assigned Special Duty to the 82nd PMC (Provisional) performing parachute packing and maintenance. Mail was handled in the same way. Bill sent letters home in 1943 and 1944 with the return address being Service Company 505th PIR regardless of whether or not he was assigned to Special Duty in the PMC (Provisional). In the case of citations related to individual merit on the battlefield, these men were again assigned their awards based on their technical (parent) company designation, regardless of which combat company they were assigned to for an invasion. This was the case for Bill’s Combat Infantryman Badge citation which states that he is assigned to the 505th PIR Service Company.

Mission of the 82nd PMC (Provisional)

The company’s mission was to maintain, repair, pack, safeguard, inspect, issue, and recover used parachutes. They were also tasked with the design and manufacture of specialized parachute equipment bundles for a variety of combat and field operation necessities. Already as onerous a mission as anyone would have liked, these riggers were further required to be trained combat paratroopers, and as such, they regularly participated in combat training exercises including, battlefield tactics, weapons training, close quarters combat, and practice jumps. Incidentally, by the end of his service, Bill had racked up 52 combat condition jumps. Source: Author Unknown,“82nd Parachute Maintenance Company: Letter to Office Division Parachute Officer” April 23, 1949, pp. 1-2 April 23, 1949

Organization and Tasks of the 82nd PMC (Provisional)

The company was composed of five platoons each tasked with specific functions to perform. There were two “Packing Platoons”. As the term suggests they were responsible for the inspection and packing of parachutes, but they had additional duties. Before a man boarded a plane for a jump he was inspected by a paratrooper from a Packing Platoon to ensure his equipment was functional and was fitted correctly. At the training drop zones used in preparation for a combat operation, members of the Packing Platoons recovered used parachutes and equipment bundles. During actual combat operations riggers chosen from all of the PMC (Provisional) platoons were selected to jump with the combat units to recover equipment from the drop zones, primarily to  clear the way for gliders and airplanes and also to quickly recover parachutes to prevent their damage.

The third platoon was termed the “Maintenance Platoon”. When a member of a Packing Platoon found a defect in a parachute or equipment bundle either during an inspection or after recovery, it was transferred to the Maintenance Platoon for inspection to determine if it could be repaired locally or needed to be forwarded to a parachute depot for more extensive repair. The Maintenance Platoon used light and heavy sewing machines and other machinery to effect parachute repairs. This platoon was also responsible for the design and manufacture of the equipment bundles to address the needs peculiar to airborne combat teams.

The forth platoon was called the “Air Force Supply Platoon”. Once a parachute or equipment bundle was packed and successfully inspected by a Packing Platoon, it was stored by the Air Force Supply Platoon which issued it for use when requested. They maintained the records of the receipt and issue of parachutes and equipment bundles. While in storage they made periodic inspections of the Division’s inventory. They were responsible for the safekeeping of all this equipment which was no small thing as its value was USD $8,000,000 in 1944 or USD $105,530,000 in 2013 according to the currency calculator at the US Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) found here: http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl

A “Headquarters Platoon” made up the final and the fifth platoon.  They were tasked with all of the administrative work for the PMC (Provisional) so that the other platoons could fully concentrate on their own separate tasks. They ran the company mess, motor pool, supply and personnel sections and were responsible for scheduling combat and jump training for the riggers of the other platoons. The men of Headquarters Platoon were combat riggers in their own right which meant they were trained in all tasks of rigging and combat so that at a moment’s notice they could work as a member of any of the other platoons when required. Source:  Author Unknown,“82nd Parachute Maintenance Company: Letter to Office Division Parachute Officer” April 23, 1949, pp. 1-2 April 23, 1949

On the question of which platoon Bill was assigned to, there is evidence that he (and most likely all riggers in the 82nd PMC (Provisional) ) was trained to perform the tasks of all four operational platoons. There is no evidence that Bill was ever assigned to the Headquarters Platoon. From Bill’s Separation Papers it’s clear he inspected parachutes and packed them, and used sewing machines. He told stories of working in a team of two to inspect parachutes on 12’ X 12’ tables indicating that he was at times assigned to a Packing Platoon. In other stories he told of using sewing machines to make special equipment packs which indicates he had variously been assigned to the Maintenance Platoon. In a later post, I will relate a story he told involving the record keeping of packed parachutes indicating he was assigned to the Air Force Supply Platoon on at least one occasion.

Changes in the Organization of the 82nd Airborne Riggers After the Normandy and Rhineland Campaigns

On October 26, 1944 the 82nd PMC (Provisional) received a letter from 82nd Airborne Division Headquarters which ordered a change to the unit designations of its men. Instead of Service Company 505th PIR, Bill and the rest of the 505 riggers were now designated Detachment No. 1 Service Company 505th PIR. Riggers from the former 504th PIR and 508th PIR were similarly designated respectively as: Detachment No. 1 Service Company 504th PIR; and Detachment No. 1 Service Company 508th PIR. The 507th* PIR had been earlier detached from the 82nd so it wasn’t affected by this change. Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 12. Date unknown.

There were also riggers from other companies in the 82nd Airborne, specifically: the 456 and 376 Parachute Field Artillery Battalions, and the 307 Parachute Engineers Battalion. These men were now assigned to Detachment No. 1 Service Company 504th PIR. Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 12. Date unknown.

Despite these changes, the men of the 82nd PMC (Provisional) worked and lived as they did before the change in unit designation. Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 12. Date unknown.

I am aware of two letters Bill wrote home during this time including one dated December 15, 1944 and another January 14, 1945. Both used the return address of Detachment No. 1 Service Company 505th PIR. Prior letters Bill sent used the previous designation of “Service Company 505th PIR”.

On March 1, 1945 82nd Airborne Division Headquarters issued General Order No. 25 which contained instructions to drop the “Provisional”. The 82nd Airborne Parachute Maintenance Company officially became a parent unit within the 82nd Airborne Division entirely composed of riggers from Detachments No 1. 504 and No 1. 505. Detachment No 1. 508th* PIR was not included in the reorganization. As the 82nd PMC (Provisional) did before it, the new unit reported directly to 82nd Division Headquarters. Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 12. Date unknown.

From March 1, 1945, the riggers from the 504 and 505 PIRs were permanently reassigned to the 82nd PMC.  From that date they sent mail with the return address of 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company, as Bill did in his letter home dated June 13, 1945. After March 1, 1945 any medals earned or unit citations awarded to the men of this new unit would list the recipients as being assigned to the 82nd PMC. These men were no longer members of their old parent regimental companies. The change came as a disappointment to Bill who through and through was the embodiment of a 505 trooper.

507th* The 507th PIR had been detached from the 82nd Airborne after the Normandy campaign and reassigned to the 17th Airborne Division.

508th* On April 5, 1945 the 508th PIR was detached from the 82nd Airborne Division.

The 82nd PMC (Provisional) in Preparation for the Normandy Campaign

According to the history of the 82nd PMC, from mid-February 1944, the riggers from the 505th PIR, 507th PIR, and 508th PIR, worked together as a unified team at Camp Ashwell on Cottesmore airfield, near Oakham England. Coordination of the individual regimental rigger units was necessary to achieve the massive output required for training before and use during the upcoming Normandy invasion. Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 9. Date unknown

“By this time [late April, 1944] the regiments and battalions were making training jumps, so practically all of the chutes on hand were used. The packers really had to push the quantity out again in preparation for another operation. This time the men were preparing for the famed D-Day jump.”

“[Using sewing machines] They were turning out special equipment for an entire division…on a production line scale. The bulk of this work consisted of 5,000 ammunition pouches, 1000 red star flags, chute patrol arm bands, medic arm bands, medical aprons, 500 medical kits, 16 blackout tunnels for field hospitals, 300 containers for large radios, 600 for medium radios, 900 for small radios, plus radar slings and packs for the pathfinder groups. They made 800 BAR containers, 800 LMG [Large Machine Gun] containers as well as all the harness [sic.] for mortar carts and wire wheel carts.” Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 10. Date unknown

The teams of riggers worked in two 12 hour shifts in a 24 hour operation to achieve these huge industrial sized production requirements. When they weren’t rostered to perform rigging tasks the Headquarters Platoon scheduled riggers to take part in combat and jump training. Bill said that he trained in Sherwood Forest and that the combat exercises consisted of a lot of commando style operations emphasizing close quarter fighting methods, and hand to hand combat techniques to conserve ammunition.

Bill’s official unit designation during this time was “Service Company 505th PIR”. He was assigned to Special Duty with the 82nd PMC (Provisional) in one of the Packing, Maintenance, or Air Force Supply platoons of the 505 PIR rigger section and continued working alongside the other 82nd rigger units in the sheds provided to them at Camp Ashwell. On April 22, 1944 the 504 PIR riggers arrived from Italy and joined them.

Previously, in North Africa in 1943, there were 65 505th* riggers and 75 in the 504th* assigned on Special Duty to the 82nd PMC (Provisional). At camp Ashwell as of April 20, 1944, the collective number of riggers swelled to approximately 320 and included those from the 505th, 507th, 508th, and some from the 456th Parachute Field Artillery Battalion. Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 3 & 9. Date unknown.

505th* While based in Oujda, Morocco, men from the first men of the 456th Parachute Field Artillery Battalion were assigned to work with the 505th riggers. Ten men from EGB 446 and 447 (AKA Excess Government Baggage – essentially men in reserve battalions, awaiting reassignment to a regular regimental company) were assigned to the 504th and 505th rigger sections. Bill was one of these 10 men; in his case assigned to the 505th PIR Service Company as detailed in this prior blog post: http://ww2tribute.blogspot.com/2010/07/assignment-to-505th-parachute-infantry.html.

504th* This number, presumably included the riggers from the 376 Parachute Field Artillery Battalions, and the 307 Parachute Engineers Battalion which had been part of the 82nd PMC (Provisional) since 1942 Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 2. Date unknown.

Assignment of 82nd Airborne Riggers to Combat Companies During the Normandy Campaign

As had been done in Sicily and Salerno, some of the riggers were to be selected to jump into Normandy with combat companies from their respective parent regiments.

In general the mission of riggers selected to jump into combat were  two fold:

  1. To instill confidence among the troopers that the parachutes were free of defects and had been packed correctly.
  2. To retrieve used parachutes quickly (as soon as enemy fire permitted), while they were still salvageable, and in the process clear the way for gliders and aircraft to land on the drop zones.

Upon being selected for the jump, riggers were required to train with their assigned combat companies focusing on the objectives of that unit. Once on the ground in the combat zone, these riggers would fight as infantry men on the front line in  until the battle objectives of their units were achieved and the area secure. Afterward, they would take on the task of recovering parachutes and equipment for later repair; and to clear the drop zone for gliders and aircraft to land. Source: , “82nd Parachute Maintenance Company: Letter to Office Division Parachute Officer” April 23, 1949, p. 1.

Typically,when a 505 rigger was selected for a combat jump, he would be relieved from Special Duty in the 82nd PMC (Provisional) and then assigned to the 505 Service Company. Later he would be assigned to duty in one of the 505 PIR combat companies to train on the unit’s specific objectives and when the time came he would make the jump with that company. Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 4. Date unknown.

According to the history of the 82nd PMC, there were 21 riggers (20 enlisted men and one officer, Lt. McFerren) selected from the 505 rigger section of the 82nd PMC (Provisional) who were assigned to the 505 Service Company and subsequently assigned to separate combat companies for the Normandy jump. Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 10. Date unknown.

All but one of the 505 riggers selected to jump into Normandy are photographed and/or named in Photo 7 below.

505_riggers_pred_day_thumb34

Photo 7: The 505 Riggers Selected to Jump with the 505th Parachute Infantry Regiment into Normandy

Source: National Archives

William Clark is not listed as a name on the annotation and he does not appear in the photograph of the 505 riggers before the Normandy jump. There are only 19 enlisted men listed in the photo’s annotation. There are 20 men listed in the annotation counting Lt. McFerren. But there should be 20 enlisted men and one officer.

The History of the 82nd PMC states:

“About 65 of the men in camp jumped into Normandy on D-Day…The 505 was a typical combat team as they jumped two riggers to a company totaling 20 riggers and 1 officer.” Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 10. Date unknown.

According to this one enlisted man, the 2oth, is missing from the photo’s annotation. It is possible that Bill is the one man not listed in Photo 7.

As we have seen in the first post on Normandy, the evidence is incontrovertible that Bill in fact fought there. Despite the discrepancy in Photo 7, the fact that he was present in Normandy demonstrates that he did not necessarily need to follow the established route a rigger takes to make the team assigned to the combat jump. That is, he did not necessarily need to be transferred out of the 82nd PMC (Provisional), into Service Company 505, and then into a 505 combat company in order to make the jump or even glider mission into Normandy.

Unless Bill is the missing man in Photo 7’s annotation, all the evidence points to his transfer to a different  unit of the 505, possibly at short notice (or even a unit outside of the 505), thereby not making the regimental rigger team in Photo 7.

If he wasn’t with the official team of 505 riggers jumping into Normandy, then this was not the first time Bill found a way to make his way into a jump. In Salerno he volunteered and somehow was chosen to jump in a 504th PIR serial. As we have seen and will see in future posts, Bill developed an affinity for volunteering during his time in the service. For instance, he volunteered to go on patrols during the Battle of the Bulge. Later he placed his name on a list in the hopes of being selected for occupation duty in Berlin, Germany and subsequently was assigned there.

Other Possibilities Explaining Bill’s Unit Assignment

One possibility is that Bill replaced a man who was sick or was injured before D-Day. The History of the 82nd PMC makes mention of one man, Herbert Ott, who was relieved from Special Duty in the 82nd PMC (Provisional), assigned to Service Company 505 and was selected to make the jump into Normandy.

“As the men were loading the planes for the fateful morning of 6 June 1944, Ott of the 505 was wounded by a land mine exploding.” Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 10. Date unknown.

According to a Letter to the Division Parachute Officer dated April 23, 1949 detailing the duties of the 82nd PMC and how it functioned and was composed in WWII:

“Before any parachutist boards a plane for a jump he is inspected by a member from the packing platoons to insure that his equipment is in good shape and properly fitted. Again at the drop zones, members of the packing platoons are present to safeguard and aid in the recovery of Air Force equipment.” Source: , “82nd Parachute Maintenance Company: Letter to Office Division Parachute Officer” April 23, 1949, p. 1.

Because we know Bill jumped in Sicily and Salerno, and packed parachutes, it is quite possible he was assigned to a parachute packing platoon in the 82nd PMC (Provisional) at the time before the Normandy jump. If he was not otherwise selected for the jump, this would make it possible for him to be present while the paratroopers were boarding their C-47s on June 5, 1944. It is conceivable that he volunteered to replace an frightened, sick, (or injured trooper such as Ott), before they took off and was given permission to jump at short notice.

Indeed, there are cases of men who otherwise would have missed the jump finding ways to make it. In the case of the explosion involving Ott, his C-47 was damaged and it couldn’t take off. All those onboard were injured except one man who was able to find a seat on board another aircraft. Source: “All American All the Way: The Combat History of the 82nd Airborne Division in World War II, Phil Nordyke, 2005, p. 199.

There was a lot of latitude given to troopers in making their own decisions to participate in combat jumps even when they were convalescing from injuries. In one case, a man with a broken hand was given the choice of jumping into Normandy or staying behind. Despite his broken hand being in a bandage, he decided to do it and successfully made the jump. Source: “All American All the Way: The Combat History of the 82nd Airborne Division in World War II, Phil Nordyke, 2005, p. 197.

Even if copies of other records such as morning reports, (which were burned in the 1973 fire at the National Archives Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri) do exist and suggest that he may not have jumped; it is evident there were several avenues for Bill to volunteer to make the jump into Normandy and have it approved at very short notice without documentation.

As mentioned above, evidence abounds that Bill had a proclivity for volunteering for duty at short notice and that he had a track record for finding ways to make jumps. It was a major blow to those riggers who were left behind in England during the Normandy invasion. We will see in the next blog post that by the time Normandy came around, Bill was widely recognized as an “Old Man” who knew the system very well and was adept at working it to his advantage. If he wasn’t selected as one of the 2o riggers making the Normandy jump for the 505 PIR, he would have done everything in his power to make it there by whatever means possible.

From photographic evidence and his service record, we already know that Bill was in Normandy. So even if records such as morning reports turn up in future and do not  support his transfer from Special Duty 82nd PMC (Provisional) to Service Company 505, and then to a 505 combat company, it is abundantly clear he found another way to get into Normandy either via parachute or possibly even a glider. 

Question 2: Which unit was Bill assigned to for the Normandy invasion?

Photographic Evidence Pertaining to Bill’s Unit Assignment During Normandy

Bill sent a letter home in 1944 which included a picture. The exact date of the letter is unknown. However the picture was affixed to a Christmas card issued by the 82nd Airborne for use in connection with Christmas 1944. See Photo 8 below.

The previous year, Bill sent a Christmas card home post marked November 1, 1943 (55 days before Christmas). It could take around six weeks for mail to be delivered at the time, so in all likelihood he sent the 1944 Christmas card home at about the same time of year, at approximately November 1, 1944. What is interesting is that in the picture he is wearing a Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) badge on his right breast. At the time the PUC was called the Distinguished Unit Citation. The name changed from DUC to PUC on November 3, 1966. His Honorable Discharge records a distinguished unit badge which means he was assigned to a unit when it received the PUC.

Merry_Christmas_1944_thumb34

Photo 8: Picture of Bill Clark most likely taken after September 22, 1944 which he included in a Christmas Card sent home to his family. The photograph clearly shows the Presidential Unit Citation badge displayed on his right breast.

Photo 8 does not have Bill’s Bronze Service Stars pinned onto his EAME ribbon. Bill was notorious for not always wearing all of his medals. According to his brother Henry, the second occasion that Bill visited him in Heston airdrome outside London, he wore only his EAME campaign ribbon and didn’t wear any Bronze Service Stars at all. Bill is wearing his efficiency award ribbon in Photo 8 above, but it does not appear in  Photo 1 of 1945 shown in the previous blog post, which was shot approximately eight months later.

Photo 8 is evidence that he was assigned to a unit which received the PUC during Normandy. Prior to Normandy the only 82nd Airborne units to receive the PUC were:

  • 319th Glider Field Artillery Battalion
  • Company H, 504th Parachute Infantry Regiment
  • Headquarters Battery, 80th Airborne Antiaircraft Battalion
  • Battery D,E,F, 80th Airborne Antiaircraft Battalion; and
  • Medical Detachment, 80th Airborne Antiaircraft Battalion.

These units were awarded the PUC for their roles as part of the Ranger force which seized and held the Chiunzi Pass during the Naples-Foggia Campaign in September of 1943. (See the previous posts regarding Salerno and the liberation of Naples). Bill was not assigned to any of these units while he was in Italy, nor at any time in 1944, so he couldn’t be wearing the PUC awarded to these units.

Determining which units received the PUC in Normandy and when they received it might help narrow down the unit he was most likely assigned for that campaign. The 82nd Airborne units which received the PUC for Normandy were:

  • 82nd Airborne Division Headquarters and Headquarters Company
  • 325th Glider Infantry
  • 505th PIR
  • 507th PIR (attached to the 82nd Airborne for the Normandy Campaign)
  • 508th PIR (attached to the 82nd Airborne for the Normandy Campaign)
  • Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 82nd Airborne Division Artillery
  • 319th Glider Field Artillery Battalion
  • 320th Glider Field Artillery Battalion
  • 82nd Airborne Signal Company
  • 307th Airborne Medical Company
  • Headquarters and Batteries A, B, and C 80th Airborne Antiaircraft Battalion
  • Companies A and B, 307th Airborne Engineer Battalion

Source: “I’m the 82nd Airborne Division” Anzuoni, P. 2005 p. 355

The procedure for issuing a PUC to a unit in WWII was as follows. The unit was cited for the PUC in General Orders of the Division Headquarters or the Army Group to which it was assigned. These were then forwarded to the Commanding General of the Theater of Operations for approval or disapproval. If approved the recommendation was forwarded to the Secretary of War for assessment. If approved at that level, the award was authorized in a General Order issued by the War Department and signed by the Secretary of War. It was only after the award was authorized by the Secretary of War that the unit was actually awarded the PUC and badges physically issued to individual soldiers.

To narrow down Bill’s possible unit assignments in Normandy it is reasonable to assume he would have been assigned to a parachute infantry regiment. For the three parachute regiments of the 82nd Division and the 82nd Division HQ & HQ Company, which took part in the Normandy invasion, the dates of initial division level citation of the PUCs, their dates of final approval/authorization of award by the Secretary of War, and War Department General Order numbers are:

Unit

Div. General Order Citation Date

Secretary of War Award Date

War Dept. General Order Number

82nd Division HQ & HQ Co. 4 August 1944 22 August 1944 GO 69 WD 44
505th PIR 10 August 1944 22 September 1944 GO 76 WD 44
507th PIR 10 August 1944 22 September 1944 GO 76 WD 44
508th PIR 10 August 1944 22 September 1944 GO 76 WD 44

Source: “Maneuver Center of Excellence Libraries Donovan Research Library US Armor Research Library Historical General Orders/Special Orders Collection: General Orders 1942- 1945” Retrieved from http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/General%20Orders/GeneralOrders/GO%201942-1944.pdf (WARNING: Very large file. Opening it in you browser will take a long time and possibly cause a crash. RIGHT CLICK your MOUSE to SAVE it. Then open the file once downloaded.)

Note: Read the post Meaning of GO 33 WD 45 on a WWII Veteran’s Discharge for more information on other War Department General Orders including PUC text, the text of other unit citations, Meritorious Service Awards, the names of Bronze and Silver Star recipients in WWII, as well as dates, and geographical limitations of  Bronze Service Star qualifying campaigns in WWII.

Bill’s Assignment to 82nd Airborne Division HQ Company or the 505, 507, or 508 PIR

According to the testimonies of Bill and his brother Henry documented in the first post on Normandy, Bill fought with the 505 PIR in St. Mere Eglise in Normandy. Photo 8 of Bill wearing the PUC badge on his uniform before Christmas 1944 and the preceding analysis of units awarded the PUC tells us that he was assigned to a unit which received the PUC award for the Normandy Campaign. The PUC for the 505th PIR, was awarded on 22nd September 1944 which means that Photo 8 must have been taken after that date. (See Note 1 containing the citation text below).

Almost certainly Bill received the PUC badge for being assigned to the 505 during June 6 – 9, 1944.  While it is plausible that Bill could have been assigned to an 82nd Airborne parachute regiment other than the 505th, it is unlikely. However, due to the mis-dropped serials of paratroopers from the 508th and 507th PIRs, it is conceivable that he was assigned to one of them and wound up in St. Mere Eglise on June 6th. This is a remote likelihood, but for the sake of exhausting all credible possibilities it needs to be at least mentioned as a candidate.

Besides the 507th or 508th PIR, (See Note 1 below for the PUC texts), Bill’s other possible assignment is to the 82nd Division Headquarters Company (See Note 2 below for this PUC text).

 

GO761944Top_thumb3

GO761944P6_thumb3

GO761944P7_thumb3

Note 1: 82nd Airborne 505th , 507th, and 508th PUC for Normandy was awarded on September, 22 1944

Source: “Maneuver Center of Excellence Libraries Donovan Research Library US Armor Research Library Historical General Orders/Special Orders Collection: General Orders 1942- 1945” Retrieved from http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/General%20Orders/GeneralOrders/GO%201942-1944.pdf

GO691944Top_thumb5

GO691944P3_thumb3

GO691944P4_thumb3

Note 2: 82nd Airborne Division Headquarters & Headquarters Company PUC for Normandy was awarded on August 22, 1944

Source: “Maneuver Center of Excellence Libraries Donovan Research Library US Armor Research Library Historical General Orders/Special Orders Collection: General Orders 1942- 1945” Retrieved from http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/General%20Orders/GeneralOrders/GO%201942-1944.pdf

There is further evidence that Bill was assigned to one of the four units during the time they received their PUCs for Normandy and not assigned to it subsequently.

As per Note 3 below, if he was assigned to the unit at a time after the events happened he would only be allowed to wear the Distinguished Unit Badge while he was assigned to the unit. Once he was reassigned to a different unit, he would not be eligible to wear it.

image_thumb3 Note 3: Excerpt of Army Regulations No. 600-40 War Department 31 March 1944 paragraph 68

 

Bill has the Distinguished Unit Badge (or PUC) on his his service record. In Photo 8 he is wearing the citation badge associated with it. In Photo 1 taken after May 11, 1945 he is wearing the citation badge even though he was assigned to the 82nd PMC at that time; a unit which never received the award. 

According to Paragraph 68-3 of Army Regulations No. 600-40 War Department 31 March 1944, these facts mean it was not a temporary decoration. When Photo 1 was taken Bill was not part of the unit which received the PUC. As of March 1, 1945 Bill was reassigned from Detachment 1 Ser Co 505 PIR to the 82nd PMC, so the only way he could still wear the PUC for Normandy is if he was assigned to the awarded unit on the dates that unit was cited.

In other words, Bill must have been assigned to the 82nd Division Headquarters Company, the 505th PIR, the 507th PIR or the 508th PIR during the dates of 6 – 9 June 1944, with the 505th PIR being the most certain one.

Question 3: What was Bill’s mission in Normandy?

Given Bill’s rigging background and skills, his primary mission in the Normandy invasion most likely was parachute and equipment recovery.

If Bill was not a member of the official 505 PIR rigger team jumping into Normandy, one important clue to the mystery of his exact mission may come from the pre-Normandy movements of his commanding officer, Captain Albert G. Marin the commander of the 82nd PMC (Provisional) from November 1st, 1943 until June 1, 1944. source: I’m the 82nd Airborne Division Anzuoni, P. 2005 pp. 363

Interestingly, according to the Unit History of the 82nd PMC a few days before the Normandy jump Captain Marin was relieved from duty with the 82nd PMC (Provisional) and reassigned to 82nd Division Headquarters. He was promoted to Major on June 1, 1944. During the Normandy invasion his new duties required his close contact with the 82nd PMC (Provisional). Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, p. 10. Date unknown.

Did Bill somehow follow Major Marin in an associated capacity out of the 82nd PMC (Provisional) and into one of the 82nd Division units invading Normandy? Did Major Marin or other commander recommend him and possibly other men to the 82nd Airborne Division G-4 for the Normandy jump (the newly promoted Lt. Col. Bennie A. Zinn), resulting in a late and possibly not documented transfer from the 82nd PMC (Provisional) and into the 82nd Division Headquarters Company, the 505th PIR (and/or the 507th or 508th) to help in the recovery efforts? Did he and other riggers jump and/or glide in with these units to help recover parachutes and equipment initially dropped as well as to recover additional supplies dropped in the early days of the invasion?

It is well known that the parachute equipment recovery efforts were badly hampered by the local conditions in Normandy. The recovery of equipment proved to be extremely difficult, due to the fields being purposely flooded by the Germans. The men of the 82nd had enormous problems in retrieving bundles delivered by parachute which contained bazookas, mines, radios and other vital equipment  from the swamp land. Source: Gavin, J. “On to Berlin: Battles of an Airborne Commander 1943 - 1946” 1978 pp. 105 – 107.

Moreover some of these bundles had landed hidden and unseen behind hedgerows, and some had fallen into German hands.

Another account of recovery difficulties states:

“Glider-borne anti-tank six-pound guns and considerable equipment were lost as widely scattered gliders were wreaked or came under fire. This was the pay-off of hectic, rushed planning.” Source: List of Important Battles pp. 43-44 “Maneuver Center of Excellence Libraries Donovan Research Library US Armor Research Library Historical Microfilm Documents Collection “D78 Item nos. 2000-2019 - United States Army 82nd Airborne Division narratives from operations in Sicily, Italy, Normandy, Holland, Ardennes, and Central Europe, August 1942-May 1945” Retrieved from http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/Documents/Microfilm/index.htm which can be found at http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/virtual.htm Direct link to the PDF file: http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/Documents/Microfilm/film/D1-D630/D78_I2000-2019.pdf pp. 43 – 44

Given these losses and recovery difficulties which were apparently caused in part by “rushed planning”, and compounded by the harsh terrain, it is plausible that Bill would be chosen as part of a late transfer of  rigger personnel from their maintenance duties to active combat duty at about the same time that their commander, Albert Marin, was transferred to Division Headquarters with orders to work closely with the 82nd PMC (Provisional).

In the few days leading up to the invasion, concern grew over the inadequacy of the planned equipment recovery measures. This in turn could have led to an effort to augment  the plan with additional personnel from the 82nd PMC (Provisional) tasked with recovering lost and all but inaccessible equipment bundles.

With two combat jumps under his belt at the time of the Normandy Invasion, Bill was inarguably one of the most experienced riggers in the 82nd Airborne Division. He was just the type of man the newly promoted Major Marin would have recommended to Lt. Col. Zinn, (the G-4 for Normandy from June 1, 1944 – June 16 1944) to reinforce the difficult recovery efforts in the early days of the Normandy campaign.

Question 4: Did Bill arrive in Normandy via parachute or glider and on what date?

There would be two ways for additional recovery personnel to arrive in Normandy – via parachute or glider.  First, these men would have been relieved from Special Duty in the 82nd PMC (Provisional) and re-assigned to the 82nd Division Headquarters Company, or the 505th , 507th, or 508th PIRs at around the same time Major Marin was transferred to Division Headquarters on June 1, 1944. Those assigned to a parachute regiment would have then made the jump with their outfit in a C-47 serial as part of Mission Boston in Force A in the early hours of June 6 as documented at the French D-Day website

http://www.6juin1944.com/assaut/aeropus/en_page.php?page=para.

These men would almost certainly have encountered combat before being able to achieve their primary objective – the recovery of chutes and equipment bundles.

Alternatively, if they were assigned to the 82nd Division Headquarters Company, they could have landed in one of the glider serials carrying elements of  that unit as part of Mission Detroit in Force B at 4:07 AM on June 6 and (again probably after initial combat) then went to work recovering equipment. Another possibility would be a later glider landing as part of Mission Elmira in Force B at 9:10 AM , 9:20 AM, 11:00 PM, or 11:10 PM on June 6. You can see the tables for these glider serials at http://www.6juin1944.com/assaut/aeropus/en_page.php?page=glide

Below are the Glider tables for Operation Neptune. Equipment recovery troopers could have been squeezed into any number of them.

Glider Serial 1

Glider Table 1 of 2 for the 82nd Airborne in Operation Neptune (Click for higher resolution)

Source: “Maneuver Center of Excellence Libraries Donovan Research Library US Armor Research Library Historical Microfilm Documents Collection “D78 Item nos. 2000-2019 - United States Army 82nd Airborne Division narratives from operations in Sicily, Italy, Normandy, Holland, Ardennes, and Central Europe, August 1942-May 1945” Retrieved from http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/Documents/Microfilm/index.htm

which can be found at http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/virtual.htm

Direct link to the PDF file: http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/Documents/Microfilm/film/D1-D630/D78_I2000-2019.pdf Page 119

Glider Serial 2

Glider Table 2 of 2 for the 82nd Airborne in Operation Neptune (Click for higher resolution)

Source: “Maneuver Center of Excellence Libraries Donovan Research Library US Armor Research Library Historical Microfilm Documents Collection “D78 Item nos. 2000-2019 - United States Army 82nd Airborne Division narratives from operations in Sicily, Italy, Normandy, Holland, Ardennes, and Central Europe, August 1942-May 1945” Retrieved from http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/Documents/Microfilm/index.htm

which can be found at http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/virtual.htm

Direct link to the PDF file: http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/Documents/Microfilm/film/D1-D630/D78_I2000-2019.pdf Page 120

Since we have already established that Bill was present in Normandy and is wearing the PUC while assigned to the 82nd PMC (a unit which did not receive it) means he either jumped in as a member of one of the four PUC units on June 6 at H hour, or landed in a glider on the morning of June 6, or in one of the glider serials later that day.

But Bill’s own testimony concurs with the scenario that he parachuted into Normandy, landed in St. Mere Eglise and fought with the 505. It also is the explanation that best fits the facts documented in his service record, and in photographs, so this is almost certainly what happened. If Bill arrived in a parachute then there are several alternative possibilities to explain how he did it. In the first, he was assigned as a combat rigger in the 505 following the established channels for eventual assignment to a combat company in the 505. In the second, he was given a late jump assignment to the 505 at the time Captain Marin was transferred Division Headquarters around June 1 to reinforce the difficult equipment recovery conditions. In the third possibility, as a member of the 82nd PMC (Provisional) Packing Platoon, while checking the jumpers’ equipment on the airfield itself, he volunteered to jump, and was given permission to do so. In all three possibilities he would have arrived in at St. Mere Eglise on the early morning of June 6 anywhere from 1:51 AM to 2:03 AM. He would have taken off from either Cottesmore airfield in serial 17, or 18 and hit drop zone O at 1:51 AM or 1:57 AM respectively. Or he took off from Spanhoe airfield in serial 19 and landed in drop zone O at 2:03 AM. We know his C-47 did not mis-drop his stick because he said he landed in St. Mere Eglise.

Bill’s Sole Surviving Memento from Normandy

US occupation francs were printed and distributed to the paratroopers jumping into Normandy. When Bill returned from the War he brought some of the currency home and said it was left over “invasion money” he used when he was in Normandy. All that survives from his collection is this 2 Franc note or “Deux Francs” in French. The date “SERIE DE 1944” is clearly visible on the front.

France_Invasion_Money_Front_thumb45France_Invasion_Money_Back_thumb44 

French Invasion Money issued to Bill Clark prior to the Invasion of Normandy. Source: Author’s Collection

© Copyright Jeffrey Clark 2013 All Rights Reserved.

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Normandy Part 1: Establishing Bill Clark’s Presence in the Invasion

The work of the 82nd Airborne combat riggers in World War II had always been demanding. They were responsible for parachute maintenance and packing, as well as manufacture of specialized equipment packs for heavy weapons, radios, ammunition, etc. At the time prior to the Normandy invasion, the number of practice jumps had increased translating into more work for the riggers. Their numbers swelled to keep pace with the growing demand. 

From the beginning in North Africa, the riggers were on a rotation schedule when it came to combat jumps. At that time there were 65 riggers in the 505th PIR and 75 in the 504th PIR. Forty men and officers from the 505 were selected for the Sicily jump and 31 for Salerno. The same numbers were selected from the 504, for these jumps, respectively. For the Normandy jump, 20 riggers and one officer per regiment (505, 507, and 508) were chosen. Source: Author Unknown, “82nd Airborne Division: 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company” Section 1 Unit History, pp. 4 –5 . Date unknown

In his case, Bill had already made history by being selected for inclusion in the first US regimental sized combat jump into Sicily and had volunteered to jump into Salerno with the 504. Due to the numbers of riggers in the 505, not all of them could be selected for all four combat jumps. For each jump some would have to be left behind. On the face of it, Bill’s chances of being selected for a third jump (which could include a glider landing) would appear slim. However, close examination of surviving evidence conclusively proves that Bill took part in the Normandy invasion. This evidence includes: his Honorable Discharge; surviving photographs; period documents; his brother’s (Henry Clark Jr.) eye witness account written directly after the Normandy campaign; and postwar testimony.

In light of this evidence the answers to some intriguing questions remain shrouded in mystery. 

  1. Was Bill selected to jump as a 505 PIR combat rigger?
  2. Which unit was he assigned to for the Normandy invasion?
  3. What was his mission in Normandy?
  4. Did he arrive in Normandy via parachute or glider and on what date?

Attempting to answer these questions will be the focus of the next post. For this entry let’s analyze the evidence pertaining to Bill’s presence in the Normandy Invasion.

The Evidence Part 1:

Examination of Bill’s Honorable Discharge and Corresponding Army Regulations

On Bill’s Honorable Discharge it states that he was awarded “6 bronze stars”, which included one for Normandy. One bronze star was awarded for each of the six campaigns in which Bill participated: Sicily; Naples-Foggia; Normandy; Rhineland; Ardennes; and Central Europe. These are not Bronze Star Medals which were awarded for valor in combat. They are Bronze Service Stars; each one indicating that Bill was physically present in the zone of combat during the time frame for each respective campaign.

According to Army Regulation No. 600-40 War Department 31 March 1944 paragraph 73 b. Service stars, (See Note 1 below) the criteria for wearing a bronze service star in WWII was:

“(3) Bronze service stars are worn on the service ribbon of campaign medals for the current war to indicate credit for battle participation, a star for each battle or campaign for which credit is awarded. Silver service stars are authorized in lieu of bronze service stars in the ration of one to five, and will be placed to the right of bronze service stars.”

ServiceStarsRegulations1944_thumb2

Note 1: Excerpt of Army Regulations No. 600-40 War Department 31 March 1944 paragraph 73 b.

These regulations are clear enough. Bronze Service Stars were worn on a soldier’s service ribbon in WWII to indicate credit for each battle or campaign the soldier participated in.

Moreover, Army Regulation 600–8–22 (relevant portion presented below) covers award of Bronze Service Stars in World War II:

5–13. European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal
a. The European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal was established by Executive Order 9265, announced in
War Department Bulletin 56, 1942, as amended by Executive Order 9706, 15 March 1947. It is awarded for service
within the European-African-Middle Eastern Theater between 7 December 1941 and 8 November 1945 under any of
the conditions as prescribed in paragraph 5–13.
b. The boundaries of European-African-Middle Eastern Theater are as follows:
(1) The eastern boundary is coincident with the western boundary of the Asiatic-Pacific Theater (see para 5–13).
(2) The western boundary is coincident with the eastern boundary of the American Theater (see para 5–14).
c.
One bronze service star is authorized for each campaign under the following conditions:
(1) Assigned or attached to, and present for duty with, a unit during the period in which it participated in combat.
(2) Under orders in the combat zone and in addition meets any of the following requirements:
(a) Awarded a combat decoration.
(b) Furnished a certificate by a commanding general of a corps or higher unit or independent force that he actually participated in combat.
(c) Served at a normal post of duty (as contrasted to occupying the status of an inspector, observer, or visitor).
(d) Aboard a vessel other than in a passenger status and furnished a certificate by the home port commander of the
vessel that he served in the combat zone.
(3) Was an evadee or escapee in the combat zone or recovered from a prisoner-of-war status in the combat zone
during the time limitations of the campaign. Prisoners of war will not be accorded credit for the time spent in
confinement or while otherwise in restraint under enemy control.
d. The arrowhead is authorized for wear on this medal to denote participation in a combat parachute jump,
helicopter assault landing, combat glider landing, or amphibious assault landing, while assigned or attached as a
member of an organized force carrying out an assigned tactical mission. (The arrowhead is described in para 6–9.)”

Note 2: Excerpt from Army Regulation 600–8–22 concerning Award of Bronze Service Stars to the EAME Campaign Medal Retrieved from http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r600_8_22.pdf

Paragraph 5-13 c. (highlighted in bold above) essentially states that a Bronze Service Star is authorized when a soldier was assigned to a unit and present for duty with that unit at the time the unit participated in combat; he was under orders in the combat zone; and he was either awarded a combat decoration; or had a certificate from a commanding general that he participated in combat; or he served at a normal post of duty.

Corresponding to the six Bronze Service Stars, Bill’s Honorable Discharge also states under “Section 32. Battles and Campaigns” that he was awarded them under “GO 33 40 WD 45” which means General Orders 33 and 40 of the War Department in 1945.

I looked up these General Orders which have recently been placed on the Internet at the Maneuver Center of Excellence Libraries; a consortium of military libraries including the: Donovan Research Library; and  US Armor Research Library. The orders are found under the “Historical General Orders/Special Orders Collection”.

http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/General%20Orders/

The direct link to these General Orders is:

http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/General%20Orders/GeneralOrders/DAGO1945.pdf

If you open this PDF in your browser be mindful that depending on your Internet speed it can take a long time to load. It’s best to right click and save it instead of clicking on the link and letting it load in your browser.

This document contains nearly all of the War Department General Orders of 1945 from GO 1 through GO 124. For the purposes of our analysis of Bill’s participation in the Normandy invasion only GO 33 WD 45 is relevant at this stage. In later posts GO 40 and others will be presented as evidence of his presence elsewhere in the European Theater of Operations (ETO).

GO33P1Top

 Top Section Identifying General Order 33 War Department 1945 (AKA GO 33 WD45).

Source: “Maneuver Center of Excellence Libraries Donovan Research Library US Armor Research Library Historical General Orders/Special Orders Collection: General Orders 1945 copy 2” Retrieved from http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/General%20Orders/GeneralOrders/DAGO1945.pdf

GO30P3

Page 3 of General Order 33 War Department 1945 (AKA GO 33 WD45)

Source: “Maneuver Center of Excellence Libraries Donovan Research Library US Armor Research Library Historical General Orders/Special Orders Collection: General Orders 1945 copy 2” Retrieved from http://www.benning.army.mil/library/content/Virtual/General%20Orders/GeneralOrders/DAGO1945.pdf

Note: Paragraph 8 on page 3 above clearly states:

“8. NORMANDY

a. Combat zone – European Theater of Operations exclusive of the land areas of the United Kingdom and Iceland.

b. Time limitation – 6 June 1944 to 24 July 1944.”

Briefly, (because it will be explained in the next post), Bill was technically assigned to Service Company 505th PIR.  However, when performing his duties as a parachute rigger, he was in practice assigned special duty in the Provisional 82nd Parachute Maintenance Company (PMC). If he was chosen to jump into combat in a Bronze Star campaign (such as Sicily, Naples-Foggia, or Normandy), he would typically be relieved from special duty in the 82nd PMC (Provisional) and reassigned to the Service Company 505th PIR. Just prior to the jump, he would then be placed in a combat company belonging to the 505th PIR. 

GO 33 WD 45 states that the combat zone for Normandy excluded the land areas of the UK and Iceland. The base of the 82nd PMC (Provisional) at the time of the Normandy invasion was at Cottesmore airfield, near Oakham in England. Those 82nd riggers not selected to jump or glide into Normandy could not have earned the Bronze Service Star for that campaign because they were physically present in England during the time limitation of 6 June 1944 to 24 July 1944. It follows that since Bill earned a Bronze Service Star for Normandy he must have been in the combat zone for that campaign and not in England.

In sum, according to the official documentation it is evident that Bill fought in the Normandy campaign and by doing so was awarded a Bronze Service Star for it. Further evidence of this can be found by examining the photographs of Bill which survived the war, his brother Henry’s eye witness account, and the respective postwar testimonies of both men.

 The Evidence Part 2:

Analysis of Photographs Pertaining to Bill’s Presence in the Invasion of Normandy

Bill Post May 11 1945

Photo 1: Bill Clark in Uniform taken sometime after May 11, 1945. Source: Author’s Collection

Note: This photograph was taken before Bill’s discharge on 15 November 1945, but after he was assigned permanent duty with the 82nd PMC on March 1, 1945 (when it was re-designated from a “provisional” company to a regular company). His Service Ribbon with Arrowhead, Silver Service Star, and Bronze Star appear on his left breast underneath his Jump Wings. A portion of the Presidential Unit Citation is visible on his right breast.

You can click on Photo 1 for a very high resolution view. By so doing, careful study is needed to reveal the pertinent details. A casual or cursory examination will prove inconclusive. Close scrutiny reveals that Bill is wearing his European African Middle Eastern (EAME) campaign ribbon on his left breast, below his jump wings. A Bronze Arrowhead is pinned on the left of the ribbon, with a Silver Service Star (in lieu of five Bronze Service Stars) on the middle, and a Bronze Service Star on the right. Distinct shadows are present underneath each of these three accoutrements. It’s clear that the service star in the middle is a Silver Service Star because it is lighter in color than the Bronze Arrowhead on the left and the Bronze Service Star on the right. The Bronze Arrowhead itself is thinner and taller than either the Silver or Bronze Service Stars. The Silver Service Star represents 5 Bronze Service stars for Sicily, Naples-Foggia, Normandy, Rhineland, and Ardennes. The Bronze Service star is for the Central Europe campaign.

An enlargement of this is ribbon is shown below in Photo 2. For comparison a color photo with the same arrangement of the three accoutrements is shown in Photo 3. Notice how the Silver Service Star in Photo 3 almost disappears even in a high resolution color photo of the same size as that of Photo 2.

CloseupMedals RibbonPhoto 2: EAME Ribbon showing the Arrowhead, Silver Service Star, and Bronze Service Star. Source: Author’s Collection

Note the three distinct shadows underneath each accoutrement indicating their respective presence on the ribbon.

EAMERibbon - Copy2

Photo 3: EAME Ribbon with (left to right) Bronze Arrowhead, Silver Service Star, and Bronze Star Source: Author’s Collection

The last Bronze Star campaign in which the 82nd Airborne Division fought was Central Europe from March 22, 1945 – May 11, 1945. Photo 1 must have been taken after that date, but before his discharge on 15 November 1945 because there is no Honorable Lapel Button or sewn lozenge version of it on his right breast.

As of November 1944, the Honorable Lapel Button (AKA the “ruptured duck”) was issued to veterans upon discharge to indicate that they were honorably discharged. Bill’s Honorable Discharge also records issue of the “Lapel Button” under Section 55 of that document. Sometimes a lozenge version of the Lapel Button was sewn onto the right breast above the pocket.

“According to Circular No. 454 dated 29 Nov 1944, the War Department adopted an honorable discharge emblem for wear on the uniform of all military personnel who are discharged or separated from the service under honorable conditions. The emblem will be worn as a badge of honor indicative of honest and faithful service while a member of the Armed Forces during World War II and will be issued in addition to the button. At the time of honorable discharge or separation from the service, the emblem will be permanently affixed on the right breast of all the outer clothing centered immediately above the pocket with the long axis of the lozenge horizontal.” Source: Honorable Service Lapel Button and Honorable Discharge Emblem, The institute of Heraldry. received from http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/UniformedServices/Hon_Service_Discharge.aspx

The uniform Bill wore when he was discharged had a cloth sewn lozenge on the right breast, as is shown in Photos 4 and 5 below. Therefore, Photo 1 must have been taken on a date prior to his discharge.

Bill_Ike_Jacket_2

Photo 4: Bill’s jacket as of his discharge on November 15, 1945 with cloth sewn lozenge of the Lapel Button on the right breast Source: Author’s Collection

Ruptured_Duck_Bill_Discharge_Uniform Photo 5 Close-up of the Lapel Button Source: Author’s Collection

Corroborating Testimony by Bill’s Brother Henry Clark Jr.

From April 25 – August 6, 1944 Bill’s brother, Henry Clark Jr. was stationed in England at Heston Airdrome on the outskirts of London, near or on modern day Heathrow Airport. He had arrived in England via ship on Easter Sunday April 10, 1944 as a private in the Army Air Force’s 47th Liaison Squadron. Henry served with the 47th Liaison as a mechanic stationed in England, France, and Germany, so he was relatively nearby Bill’s unit locations in 1944 and 1945. Over those years the brothers took advantage of several furloughs and passes to meet one another on recreational leave. During these meetings, Bill told Henry much of his battle experiences. Source: Clark, H., “The War I Never Fought” 2001

Initially Henry entered the service voluntarily as an Army Air force flight cadet and was training to be a fighter pilot while based Arizona and Texas. But he suffered terrible allergies to the plants that grew in the desert southwest. His affliction was sustained for long periods of time forcing him out of flight school. He subsequently accepted an assignment as an Army Air Force  mechanic responsible for maintaining ground vehicles. Source: Clark, H., “The War I Never Fought” 2001

HenryFlightSchoolAZ

Photo 6: Henry Clark Jr. Circa 1943 Squadron # 1-43G Luke Field Phoenix, Arizona Source: Author’s Collection

While stationed in England, Henry wrote several letters home. In two of these dated April 27 and April 29, 1944 he said he had not contacted Bill yet and that in his estimation they were stationed about 80 miles apart. According to two other letters, one dated July 23, 1944 and the other August 28, 1944, Henry mentioned that Bill made two visits to him at his base. Each time, Bill rode in a jeep to Heston Aerodrome.

The first time they met outside of the US during the war was after the Normandy campaign when the 82nd Airborne Division returned from the battle of Cherbourg. The campaign itself lasted from June 6, 1944 – July 24, 1944, although the 82nd Airborne Division was sent back to UTAH Beach on July 11, 1944 where it soon left Normandy for England. Source: Anzuoni, R., “I’m the 82nd Airborne Division!” 2005, P. 134

After his return from Normandy, Bill had received a six day furlough and spent the whole time with Henry. The second visit was far shorter as Bill only had a 24 hour pass.

In his letter of 23 July, 1944 Henry writes of Bill’s visit:

“…Bill dropped in to see me since I last wrote. He had a six day furlough so he spent five days down here with me…He has done a lot of fighting in the “E.T.O.” and has three stars in his ribbon…” Source: Clark, H., Letter home dated July 23rd, 1944, P. 2.

As of the date of Henry’s letter the 505 PIR had only been in three campaigns which could have earned Bronze Service Stars. These were Sicily, Naples-Foggia, and Normandy.

Henry also recounted the visit in his book entitled “The War I Never Fought: WWII Memoirs of a ‘Rear Rank Rudy’”:

“My buddy and I were sitting on a bench watching a 2nd Lt. spray paint a vehicle, when a jeep drove up from the orderly room and out stepped my brother just back from Normandy. They were kept there to help capture Cherbourg. They were then sent back to England for regrouping, so my brother Bill got a six-day furlough. This was a big load off of my mind since I had not heard anything from him. After our initial greetings he asked us guys why we did not do the painting instead of the Lieutenant. The only answer we could think of was, he likes to paint. It soon became apparent to us that discipline here was quite different from that in the parachute infantry. Next he went with us to evening chow and there he saw a Major dishing out chow. This about blew his mind. He still talks about that. That evening we went out to the North Star pub which was about two blocks from our billet since we were all short of money due to our close proximity to these pubs, he picked up the tab. The motor pool guys enjoyed my brother’s visit, he told us a lot about how it was on the front line and many of his experiences across the channel. Their regimental objective was to capture St. Mere-Eglise which they captured about daylight and finally later in the day, they got it back for good. After his furlough he went back to Leistershire.” Source: Clark, H., “The War I Never Fought” 2001, P. 78

According to this, Bill told of how it was on the front line across the channel (meaning in Normandy). Henry states that their regimental objective was capture of St. Mere-Eglise, thereby implying that Bill was with the 505th PIR during the capture of the town on D-Day.

During an interview in November of 2005, Henry  said when they met during the six day furlough that Bill was “a real nervous type. All keyed up from some of his activities”.  He then went on to tell me about Bill’s involvement in another chapter of the Normandy Campaign – the Battle of Cherbourg. Source: Interview with Henry Clark Jr. November 4, 2005

The 82nd Airborne had lost a lot of men in the Normandy campaign. They had in fact lost a staggering 48% of their strength in glidermen and 55% of parachutists. Source: Nordyke, P., “All American All the Way: The Combat History of the 82nd Airborne Division in World War II” 2005, p. 405

Seeing how good they were in achieving their objectives, they were ordered to stay in Normandy only being relieved after capturing the port of Cherbourg.

Henry said that one story Bill used to tell involved the capturing the port. Bill told him that at one point during the battle he was manning a machine gun, using it to lay down fire upon German defensive positions. He fired so many rounds that gun overheated, and subsequently the barrel melted. Another gun was brought up and he continued firing with it. When the battle was over he looked up and saw that he was underneath a road sign. To his amusement, the sign read “Cherbourg” with an arrow pointing in the direction of his fire. Source: Interview with Henry Clark Jr. November 4, 2005

Bill’s Testimony of His Presence in Normandy during the Invasion

According an interview with his lawyer recorded in January of 2000, Bill stated that made the jump into Normandy. This corroborates what his brother stated in his letter home of July 23, 1944 and what Henry later wrote in his published WWII memoirs of 2001.

“The exact place where Bill…landed from this jump behind enemy lines was a place famous in history which he spelled as follows: ‘St. Mere Egilese’ (sic.)….Unfortunately, as soon as they landed at St. Mere Egilese, they found themselves surrounded on all sides and Bill said: ‘We just tried to fight our way out in all directions.’…After this before-daylight, morning-landing effort to break out of their surrounded position, the 82nd Airborne found that their only alternative was to settle into a holding position for a while….‘we couldn’t go very far fast because of the hedgerows ---- the famous hedgerows of France.’ Bill said, ‘That was really something. That was a helluva fight. Your enemy was often just 25 feet away…’”

“…[at some later time Bill was] sent to Cherbourg, France. They were told that they needed to capture this city because it was a deep water port and we needed it for bringing in reinforcements. Bill remembers that as they entered the outskirts of the city, German troops who were already captured came back through their lines. Bill indicates that they were ‘really happy to be captured and to be getting good food. The fight had gone out of them. The thing they seemed most interested in doing was telling us where in Cherbourg we could find the best cat houses’”.

“…Bill stated that after thirty of forty days in France, he and the 505th Regiment of the 82nd Airborne were pulled out and sent back to England…When Bill got back to England following his aforesaid 30 to 40 days in France with the Normandy invasion, it was July, 1944. Source: “Military Biography of William A. Clark” Herd L. Bennett, Attorney at Law, January 26, 2000.

On May 3 2005, 4:30PM I interviewed Bill while he was a resident at a nursing home for the elderly in Dayton, Ohio. Bill was in bad shape. He had suffered several strokes which resulted in a nearly complete shutdown of his speech center and elimination of many of his motor skills including his ability to write, walk, and turn over in bed. He was still compos mentis, but could not string together more than four to six words in a row. This annoyed him to no end as he was obviously able to think clearly.

During the visit I informed Bill of my intentions to write his story. I showed him pictures I’d taken from Normandy. I told him why I was doing it – to remember the sacrifices he and his fellow soldiers made for all of us, and to thank him for doing what he did. In response, various emotions flickered across his face: sadness, loss, happiness, pride.

I asked Bill if he had been to Normandy before. With a look of sorrow in his eyes, he nodded his head in affirmation. I asked if he remembered liberating and defending the town of St. Mere-Eglise. After the question was posed his face become a picture of profound grief. Then after a pause he replied "Yes, I do”.

My father, James – Jim – (Bill’s brother) was also present during the interview. At various points Jim reminded Bill of some of the funny stories about the war which he had told the family when he came home. This made Bill happy and he laughed, smiled and made jokes. He remembered, drinking Calvados – a French brandy produced in Normandy and made from local apples. After the liberation of St. Mere-Eglise, the locals opened their wine cellars and gave the Americans their Calvados. At one point, Bill haltingly exclaimed “Calvados! That’s strong stuff! It’ll do the job!”. It was very evident that he had fond memories of enjoying Calvados with the local Normans after the initial days of the invasion.

Just prior to my visit with Bill I had made a trip to Normandy with my wife in April of 2005. We hired an exceptionally talented battlefield guide – Alain Chesnel; a Frenchman and well respected Normandy battlefield historian whose father had been a member of the French Resistance in WWII. You can find out more about Alain at:

 http://www.overlordtour.com/the_staff_a_chesnel.html

Alain took us on a very moving tour of the area including: the 505 PIR drop zone “O”; the town of St. Mere-Eglise; the bridge at La Fiere on the Merederet River; and Utah Beach. We paid our respects at the American Cemetery at Colleville before leaving.

When we parted ways Alain and I shook hands and he asked me to send a message to Bill and Henry. He said:

“Tell your uncles, we thank them. We are grateful to them for liberating France. It is a debt we cannot repay. We will never forget them. We will always remember.”

During my interview with Bill in the nursing home, I relayed Alain Chesnel's message of gratitude. He looked at me with an alert expression, desperate to speak, frustrated by his inability to get his words out. I asked him if he was happy to receive Alain's message of thanks. “Yes!” he gasped, with a fierce pride flashing in his blue eyes.

One word ran through my mind – “Airborne!” Even at this final stage of his life, Bill was still the embodiment of what it meant for a man to have been a World War II paratrooper.

A Note on the Battle for Cherbourg and Bill’s Weapons Training

The various accounts of  Bill’s activities in Normandy are all complementary and are consistent with the historical timeline and  assignments of the 82nd Airborne and the 505th PIR in that campaign.  One question I had concerned Bill’s MOS which according to his separation papers lacks an MOS for a machine gunner; 604 Light Machine Gunner, or 605 Heavy Machine Gunner. As a combat rigger, before the  jump Bill had extensive training in machine guns and a variety of other heavy weaponry. Documentary evidence exists which supports this fact and therefore, the story that Bill told about firing a machine in the battle for Cherbourg.

Before the invasions of Sicily and the Italian mainland at Salerno, in North Africa, Bill trained with the combat company he had been assigned to in the use of all weapons (including enemy weapons):

“A rigorous physical training program was established for all personnel in addition to intensified training in the firing of all weapons including Light Machine guns, 60mm and 81mm mortars…After slightly more than a month of desert training, the Division was in excellent physical condition, well qualified in the handling of all combat weapons and had successfully participated in the training problems requiring combined ground operations” Source:  Jost, H., “Airborne Operations in Sicily, July 1943”, Advanced infantry Officers Course 1948-49, pp. 8-10

“In North-Africa they had trained with enemy weapons, and they knew that the German machine-gun had a much higher rate of fire than the American weapons” Source: Ruggero, E., “Combat Jump”, p 291, 2005

And while in Sicily Company A commander, 505th Ed Sayer reported:

Within about thirty minutes, two companies of enemy troops were seen moving across the open ground to the front toward our position. When they were within about two hundred yards of the positions, they were fired on by all of the twenty (captured) machine guns.*

* All personnel of the 505th Parachute Combat Team had received training in the firing of enemy weapons in Africa” Source:  Sayer, Edwin M., (Personal experience of a company commander) “The operations of company “A” 505th parachute infantry (82nd Airborne) Airborne Landings in Sicily. 9-24 July 1943 (Sicilian Campaign)”. p 12

Conclusion

So far three things are clear:

  1. Bill’s Honorable Discharge and Photo 1 are in agreement with each other on the subject of his six Bronze Service Star awards and therefore his combat participation in the Normandy campaign according to Army Regulations No. 600-40 War Department 31 March 1944 covering the wear of Bronze and Silver Service Stars; Army Regulation 600–8–22 covering eligibility for Bronze Service Star awards for participation in a EAME combat zone; and GO 33 WD 45 defining the time period limitations and combat location boundaries of the Normandy campaign.
  2. Henry Clark’s eye witness account of Bill’s three service stars as reported in his letter dated July 23, 1944 and his published book account of Bill’s presence in Normandy further corroborate the evidence that Bill fought in Normandy with the implication that he was with the 505 liberating St. Mere-Eglise on D-Day and later in Cherbourg.
  3. Bill’s post war testimony agrees with that of his brother’s and places him in Normandy, specifically in St. Mere-Eglise on D-Day fighting in the hedgerows and later in Cherbourg before leaving with the 505th PIR.

All of this together provides irrefutable evidence that Bill was in the Normandy invasion. To get there he must have been assigned to a unit. The questions of which unit, what its mission was, and when he arrived will be covered in the next post.

Like Alain Chesnel, I owe my own thanks to Bill and Henry. Their testimonies helped to confirm Bill’s presence as a member of the 82nd airborne invasion force in Normandy. Their relationship was a close one, but that’s not very surprising since they were first brothers of blood and later brothers in arms. Sadly, they have both since passed on. Bill passed away on February 13, 2008 aged 85 and Henry more recently on August 20, 2011 aged 90. May God rest their souls and may their legacy endure.

 

Henry Bill_Heston2

Clark Brothers: William (Bill) on left & Henry Clark Jr. on right. England early August 1944

Source: Author’s Collection

© Copyright Jeffrey Clark 2013 All Rights Reserved.